|
 |

In a recent letter to Congressional leaders, the attorneys general of twenty-one states urged both the Senate and House to move forward on legislation supported by CURE that would remove the railroad industry’s antitrust exemptions. The letter underscored the adverse consequences that every state and industry face as a result of unrestrained railroad monopoly power.
Because of poor railroad service and outrageous rail rates, consumers are paying more for everything from food to electricity and businesses are thinking twice about locating in areas that are captive to a single railroad. This means lost jobs, wages and economic opportunities for the states and their citizens while railroads continue to rake in the cash thanks to their ability to charge rail customers as much as they would like.
As the state attorneys general noted in their letter, the Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act (S. 772 and H.R. 1650) currently pending in Congress would remove the railroads’ antitrust exemptions and bring them under the nation’s basic laws that ensure competition in every other industry. Opening the industry to competition will help break the four major railroad companies’ stronghold on American businesses and consumers.
S. 772 has already been reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee to the full Senate while HR 1650, the companion bill in the House, is currently pending before the House Judiciary Committee.
According to the state attorneys general: “Rail customers in our states in a variety of industries are suffering from the classic symptoms of unrestrained monopoly power: unreasonably high and arbitrary rates and poor service, and this legislation is a part of the solution.”
This letter also marks yet another example of the widespread support for rail reform legislation that is only continuing to grow. In 2007, we participated in several Congressional hearings in the House and Senate that alerted lawmakers to the problems and very real consequences stemming from the railroad industry’s abuse of their monopoly power. As we move forward, we can expect additional hearings on rail reform issues as well as a full House and Senate vote on our legislation.
As Forbes Magazine recently noted, the push for rail reform certainly will be one of the major battles on Capitol Hill in 2008. We look forward to working with you throughout the rest of 2007 and into 2008 to finally achieve our goals of rail reform.
I invite you to explore the rest of our web site and the issues that are of concern to CURE and its members as we continue our fight to bring fairness and equity to the freight rail system.
Glenn English
Chairman
Consumers United for Rail Equity
|
 |
 |
Click here to view video clip

Small Businesses, Farmers Bear Burden of the Railroad’s Monopoly Practices
May 1, 2008
House Committee Takes Aim at Railroad Monopoly Prices
April 30, 2008
Congressional Hearing Highlights Railroads’ Monopoly Practices
April 23, 2008
A Switch on the Tracks
Washington Post, April 21, 2008
Changes are needed
in railway rules
The Advertiser, April 15, 2008
Senator Kohl: Congress should move to repeal railroads’ antitrust exemptions
The Hill, April 8, 2008
Glenn English: Captive shippers
left out in the cold
The Journal of Commerce,
March 31, 2008
Commentary: LUS: Customers pay premium for rail deregulation
The Advertiser, March 30, 2008
Shippers in Minnesota want lawmakers to intervene to
foster more competition among
the railroads
Star Tribune, March 27, 2008
ADM sues railroads for price-fixing on fuel fees
The Star Tribune, March 27, 2008
La. Utility backs regulation
The Advocate, March 17, 2008
Staying on track: Wednesday was Rail Customer Day on Capitol Hill
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,
March 16, 2008
Rail Customers to Promote Rail Reform Legislation on Capitol Hill
March 11, 2008
North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation Joins Rail Customers on Capitol Hill to Promote Rail Reform Legislation
Sun Herald, March 11, 2008
Rail Antitrust Gains Force
Traffic World, March 3, 2008
Wisconsin's Baldwin Calls for Railroad Antitrust Revocation
Bloomberg, February 25, 2008
House Judiciary Committee Focuses on Bringing the Railroads Under Antitrust Laws
February 25, 2008
Coverage from Kohl letter to Senate Majority Leader
Board ignores concerns of
some rail customers
Argus Leader, February 9, 2008
Senators Urge Reid to Move Forward on Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act
February 8, 2008
In rebuttal: Regulatory trainwreck
Sun Journal, January 18, 2008
MN Attorney General: Time to put railroads under anti-trust
Bemidji Pioneer, January 25, 2008
Ethanol boon may be a bust
In Forum, January 22, 2008
Congressional Research Service Rail Competition Report
January 10, 2008
On this monopoly board, railroads are winning
St. Paul Pioneer Press,
January 9, 2008
How Legislation Would Increase Rail Customer Access to Competition
21 Attorneys General Endorse Bill That Would Remove Antitrust Exemptions for Railroads
AP, November 29, 2007
Captive vs. Competitive Freight Rail Rates
Tonnage Traveling at Rates Over 300% R/VC, 1985
Perception of Bias at STB
Rail Business Magazine
Rail reform: It’s Competition
not Reregulation
October 25, 2007
Captive Rail Customers Say Regulator is Asleep at the Switch
October 23, 2007
All Aboard: Lobbying on the Railroad Antitrust Issue
Forbes, October 23, 2007
CSX Seeking Public Aid Amid
Its Growing Profit
October 11, 2007
Letter to the Editor of Roll Call
October 4, 2007
Senate Hearing Spotlights Need for Railroad Antitrust Coverage
October 3, 2007
Freight railroad customers complain about prices, service USA TODAY, September 27, 2007
Full Report: Consumers Railroaded out of $6.4 Billion
September 20,2007
|
 |
|